Category: Team Function

  • The Teamwork Imperative

    The Teamwork Imperative

    Over the last few years, we in radiology have faced incredible and unprecedented challenges in our day-to-day work, and this is true regardless of our specific work environments. Why? The pandemic, which has touched everyone and has had a profound impact on the workplace in general. It has changed how we work, approach work, and shaped our opinions of work. And it is not just the pandemic. It is political polarization, social unrest, changes in home life and education, the remote work life. The pandemic and its effects led to a great resignation, and as a result, many of our sites are now understaffed. It has been reported that one in five doctors plan to leave their current practice in two years; two in five nurses plan to leave their practice in two years; one in three doctors expect to work less next year.

    Health care workers have far greater demands now than in the pre-pandemic times. The delivery of health care has changed dramatically and quickly over the last few years. There is unprecedented “consumerism” in medicine now with a mandate to improve and rethink patient access, to provide more and better mental health services to our populations, and to have transparent pricing. Many health systems are facing financial challenges.

    In radiology, whether you work in a large or small private practice, remotely by yourself, an academic department in a medical center, or part of a mega-radiology practice, there has been a palpable shortage of radiologists. This shortage is fueled by a trend toward exclusive subspecialization with declining numbers of radiologists who can handle general work, ever-increasing expectations for service to our patients, referring docs, hospitals and health care systems. There is a desire by radiologists to have more flexible work hours or, simply stated, to work less hours overall compared to previous years. There is a concern about what role artificial intelligence and machine learning will play. Will we be displaced? And reimbursement has been decreasing relative to inflation and compared with other specialties. As a result of these realities and others, there is clear evidence of burnout among radiologists, similar to health care workers in other specialties. In addition, sometimes we find that the leaders in our organizations may be distant, or too corporate, or suffer from “toxic positivity,” which may be worse than “toxic negativity.”

    There has been a steady headwind for years, but it now feels like a gale-force wind. And a lot of this feels out of our control.

    One strategy to manage the headwinds and one that we can embrace and control is to develop a culture of teams within our workplaces. Establish teams as a core value within your workplace. If we have a culture of teams, we can mitigate and shield ourselves from some of these headwinds.

    When I refer to teams, I am specifically not referring to the “macro teams” that many of us find ourselves in. For example, at Duke Health, my hospital system, it is said that the 30,000-plus employees are my “teammates.” That very well may be true. But no, I am referring to your local and focal team. I am referring to the individuals that you rely on daily or weekly to deliver your work product. It’s the folks you huddle with. And the teams develop where you huddle. If you are in training, I am referring to your team of co-residents, your chief residents, maybe your program director or coordinator who you lean on. If you are in a private practice, I am referring to those that you share physical space with, or perhaps switch call with, or the individuals you show difficult cases to, or the referring docs you have developed close relationships with, and who rely on you to deliver care.In an academic environment, it might be the members of your subspecialty division. If done well, the division pulls together as a team to deliver care, service, teaching, and research. Those divisions that have a culture of team are far more effective than those who are unable to act as a team. It’s The Teamwork Imperative.

    If you are lucky enough to have these local and focal teams (and these often form and evolve organically), many challenges at work open up and become more manageable and attainable. The clouds begin to lift. Specifically, your deliverables, whatever they may be, are far more easily and effectively achieved if you have your team, and approach your work from the perspective of a team. Work becomes more efficient, fulfilling, and, frankly, more fun. The work becomes more manageable—with more aspects in your control. You become more engaged. And that then becomes an antidote to burnout. Teams, therefore, contribute to retention.

    Communication in the workplace is critical to developing teams. Of course, communication is about sharing news back and forth, accurately and honestly, but more importantly, communication is to be able to probe, to be able to respectfully question, and to be able to expect honest answers from your teammates. Sometimes, the questions aren’t easy, and the answers may not be easy either. To foster an effective team requires the ability and the safety of pointing out the opportunities—those ones are easy.More important, it is to have safety in pointing out deficiencies—those are more difficult. It is critical for teammates to be able to receive and internalize the information coming from within the group, whether it is a kudo or whether it is an observation, or whether it is a deficiency or a criticism.

    You have to talk to each other. Actually talk. And in a world of remote work and texting, we don’t talk enough. Maybe the talking occurs in a partner meeting, in a defined clinical case conference, or in a resident, division, or department meeting. Maybe it is your team taking a coffee break or going for a midday walk to achieve “steps” goals. Hopefully, the team dynamics are such that one can tap a teammate on the shoulder and engage in an effective and safe conversation.

    Communication needs to be practiced. That is why standing, regular, in-person meetings, even if the agenda is light, are very important. The opportunity to come together regularly promotes the importance and expectation of communication. It is habit forming. You get better at it.

    The communication must be honest with an expectation for mutual trust. Trust means telling the truth, and telling it sooner rather than later; knowing that within a team, that can be hard.It can be hard because so many of us struggle with confrontation and conflict and try to avoid them.

    Honest and fair difficult conversations almost always produce results. If you can get through the first 30 seconds of a difficult conversation, often the clouds lift and a very productive conversation follows. For me, I need to write down the key first few sentences for that opening 30 seconds and the rest flows. If difficult conversations don’t produce results, you have learned something.

    Communicating in person is far more effective than in an email or text. Personal communication often fosters human connections and colleagueship. Time spent with each other, sharing aspects of ourselves, results in caring. The time may be as simple as grabbing a cup of coffee together or asking someone about their weekend. Caring strengthens the interconnective web between team members, making the team softer in a positive way, and more personable, yet, at the same time stronger.

    And this is whyI worry about remote work. I understand well thatthe pandemic has shown that we can do radiology effectively, even remotely. People like it and expect it. And we have learned that we can teach remotely. But it seems far more difficult to foster a genuine, caring environment when work is dispersed in many geographic locales and individuals work essentially independently, free of meaningful, direct interactions with other teammates, other humans.To me, the same applies to Zoom meetings. All the nuanced talk and greetings pre- and post-meeting are lost. The body language is lost. The sense of community is lost, or at least different. And I think the effectiveness of the meeting suffers. Indeed, on a Zoom meeting, you can’t even have real eye contact. I worry that with remote work, the culture of our teams may be eroded.

    So, work to develop teams in your workplace. Together, as a team, we are stronger. And this is something within our control. There is an imperative to create, sustain, and grow teams in our radiology workplace.

    Erik K. Paulson, MD

    Chair, Radiology

    Duke University

  • The Bright Star and Blinding Star Effect

    The Bright Star and Blinding Star Effect

    A Leadership Pearl from Reginald Munden

    John Leyendecker, an astrophysicist at heart, wrote a piece for RadTeams comparing a galaxy to a radiology department. In this blog, he explains how the mass of the stars in a galaxy are not sufficient to hold a galaxy together based on current gravitation concepts. This deficiency in mass led to the theory of dark matter, which is apparently in abundance in the universe although it cannot be detected. Fascinating explanation for one like me who certainly is not an astrophysicist; heck, I barely know any physics, but please don’t tell the ABR. Anyway, without dark matter, galaxies as we know them wouldn’t exist. His analogy is that our radiology departments are like a galaxy with our shining stars (luminary faculty) and dark matter (the rest of us) serving as the glue to hold us together. As strange as all this dark matter stuff sounds, as a department chair, I love the analogy. 

    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/05/01/stars-shine-but-dark-matter-holds-departments-together

    His analogy brings to mind the opposite effect upon a department by a faculty member who is a bright star, but for all the wrong reasons. This faculty member is the dysfunctional, complaining, non-worker who takes all the energy and resources of the department for themselves. They are a bright star, but certainly not a shining one. Perhaps using John’s analogy, they are a supernova—exploding and destroying all the surrounding good stuff. Their actions bring out the “dark” aspect of our dark matter faculty resulting in the department coming unglued; even worse is that happy faculty become unhappy. For these people, I like to use the analogy they are that person on a busy highway who is approaching with their bright headlights on. You know there are other automobiles out there, but you can’t see their lights because this one individual is blinding you. But, we have to see those other headlights and make sure they remain visible, otherwise there will be a major traffic accident destroying us all. How is this done? Often people will say that if they could get rid of this person (maybe their car stops working?), then things would be great. However, this is often a fallacy because remember, there are other headlights out there. When you dim one person’s lights, there may well be someone who rises to the occasion and decides to fill the void by turning on their bright lights. So that tactic doesn’t always work. What you do is to flash your bright lights at the person (confront their behavior) and often they respond. And yes, much like in heavy traffic, you may have to flash your lights at them periodically to remind them. In short, the goal is that while there may be a few bright lights out there, you want to make sure they are not blinding lights, and all lights are visible. And much like our universe, this process is somewhat nebulous.

    Reginald F. Munden, MD, DMD, MBA

    Chair, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science

    Medical University of South Carolina

    Chair, ARRS Membership Committee

    You may also be interested in
  • Stars Shine, But Dark Matter Holds Departments Together

    Stars Shine, But Dark Matter Holds Departments Together

    I once considered becoming an astrophysicist. I abandoned that dream after performing a very brief financial analysis and a realistic appraisal of my mathematical aptitude, but I never lost my passion for the vast majority of the universe that most people ignore. Living in a place where city lights shroud starry nights hasn’t been easy for the astronomer in me, but I’ve found ways to adapt and still enjoy the hobby. Besides, there are valuable lessons to be learned from any pursuit despite (or because of) the challenges.   

    Few people realize that, when we look at the night sky with the naked eye or even with sophisticated and powerful telescopes, we only see a tiny fraction of the matter that holds our galaxy together. Even when we scrutinize other galaxies with massive telescope arrays in every available bandwidth, we never find enough mass to hold a galaxy together. This discrepancy between a galaxy’s gravitational influence and a galaxy’s visible matter led to the theory of dark matter, a concept that has gained the endorsement of most astrophysicists even though the actual physics remains a bit murky. Without dark matter, galaxies as we know them wouldn’t exist. In other words, those stars that shine so big and bright deep in the heart of Texas would likely be a lot less impressive without the gravitational influence of dark matter. Physicists love particles, and one particle theorized to account for dark matter is called the weakly interacting massive particle (aka WIMP). Now, when astrophysicists aren’t busy telling jokes about Uranus, they are no doubt designing t-shirts that say things like, “WIMPs hold the universe together.”

    Like a galaxy, our academic radiology departments have bright stars. We know these stars as the luminaries who are writing papers and textbooks, getting grants, giving lectures around the world, editing journals, and engaging in similar high-profile activities everywhere but where they work.Enlightened leaders know that alone, these stars cannot keep our radiology departments together. Like galaxies, our departments need something akin to dark matter.

    Unfortunately, departmental dark matter is as easy to overlook as astronomical dark matter. I’m sure we can all think of someone who inspires and motivates others despite lacking title, reputation, or recognition proportional to their influence. That person is dark matter. If I had to assign such an individual a particle name, I would refer to them as a weakly appreciated massively-influential person (aka WAMP). Just as WIMPs provide the force needed to hold a galaxy’s stars together, WAMPs stabilize our departments and allow our academic stars to shine brighter. They do this by working hard, by projecting a positive attitude, by acting in a collegial and collaborative manner, and by sharing, rather than by hording and devouring, resources.

    Radiology leaders adore stars and want to keep them in their departments. Traditionally, leaders have thought that the key to keeping stars is to feed them—more time, more money, more prestige, more recognition, and more resources. But at some point, massive stars evolve into black holes, and the rest of the department suffers. To think that a department can continue to keep the stars without acknowledging and supporting the departmental dark matter is fallacy.

    So, the next time you get away from the city lights, look up and remember that, while those big bright stars are pretty to behold, it’s all the stuff that you are not seeing that is really holding our galaxy, and our departments, together.

    John R. Leyendecker, MD

    Professor and Vice Chairman of Academic Affairs Department of Radiology

    UT Southwestern Medical Center

    Chair, ARRS Scientific and Innovation Committee

    You may also be interested in
    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/05/01/the-bright-star-and-blinding-star-effect