Category: Wellness

  • Fall: A Time for Renewal

    Fall: A Time for Renewal

    Fall is my favorite season, a time of change that invites us to slow down, reconnect, and nurture our wellbeing. As the air turns crisp and the leaves shift to rich hues, the season offers a unique opportunity to embrace balance and self-care.

    The cooler temperatures make outdoor activities more inviting. Whether it’s a brisk morning walk or a weekend hike through the changing foliage, spending time outdoors in fall can improve mood and reduce stress. Nature’s beauty in this season also inspires mindfulness—being present in the moment, whether it’s during a walk or while enjoying a hot cup of tea.

    Fall is also a season of nourishment. With harvests of pumpkins, apples, and squash, it’s a perfect time to incorporate warm, hearty meals that fuel both body and soul. Seasonal produce supports immunity and helps prepare us for the cooler months ahead. (See here for my favorite butternut squash soup recipe!)

    As the days grow shorter, it’s natural to embrace rest. Fall is ideal for creating or refining evening routines that promote relaxation, such as reading, meditation, or enjoying a calming tea before bed. Prioritizing sleep and rest during this season help to restore energy and prepares us for winter.

    Finally, fall encourages us to let go, just as the trees shed their leaves. It’s a time for reflection, to release stress or habits that no longer serve us, and to set new intentions as we approach the year’s end.

    By aligning with the rhythm of the season, we can nurture our wellbeing and find peace in the transition that fall brings.

    Lily M. Belfi, MD, FACR

    Professor of Clinical Radiology

    Director of Medical Student Education

    Division of Emergency/ Musculoskeletal Radiology

    Weill Cornell Medicine

    In “Words of Wellness” on www.radfyi.org/, members of the ARRS Wellness Subcommittee share what “wellness” and “wellbeing” mean in their own clinical practices, research focuses, and everyday lives.

    Dr. Belfi’s ARRS “Sound of Wellness” Playlist Selection:

    Carolina In My Mind

    You may also be interested in
    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/09/20/words-sounds-of-wellness-dr-sherry-wang/
  • Defining a Well Day at Work

    Defining a Well Day at Work

    This panel discussion from the ARRS 2024 Wellness Summit examined the factors that influence a well and safe day at work, and a well day of teamwork. This discussion provides an understanding of the impact of workload, the physical work environment, relational climate, and workflow on wellbeing.

  • Strategies and Solutions for Driving Wellness

    Strategies and Solutions for Driving Wellness

    Multiple peer-reviewed studies have consistently demonstrated a high prevalence of radiologist burnout. In this session from the ARRS 2024 Wellness Summit, practical strategies and solutions to improve radiologist workflow are described.

  • Leadership Practices Fostering Wellness and Reducing Moral Distress

    Leadership Practices Fostering Wellness and Reducing Moral Distress

    This panel discussion from the ARRS 2024 Wellness Summit discusses how to implement leadership practices to reduce moral distress, enhance wellness, and share experiences as radiologists.

  • Burnout, Wellness, and More in Residency Training

    Burnout, Wellness, and More in Residency Training

    The term “burnout” dates as far back as 1974. Coined by psychologist Herbert J. Freudenberger in a Journal of Social Issues article entitled “Staff Burnout,” he discussed job dissatisfaction precipitated by work-related stress.

    Presently, burnout is included in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11)—as an occupational phenomenon, however.

    Burnout is not classified as a medical condition.

    In the WHO’s chapter on factors influencing health status or contact with health services, the agency includes reasons for which people contact health services that are not classed as illnesses or health conditions.

    And in its definition of burnout as a syndrome, the WHO identifies three key components that contribute to chronic stress associated with work:

    1. Feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion;
    2. Depersonalization, feelings of cynicism, negativity;
    3. Reduced professional efficacy.

    Burnout During Residency Training: A Literature Review

    Distress during medical school and residency can lead to burnout—which, in turn, can result in negative consequences as a working physician. Prevalent in medical students (28%–45%), residents (27%–75%, though specialty dependent), and in practicing physicians (63%), burnout’s psychological distress and physical symptoms impact both work performance and patient safety. Specific contributors of said burnout include the following: time demands, lack of control, work planning and organization, as well as inherently difficult job situations and interpersonal relationships.

    Fortunately, there are several workplace interventions for mentors to mitigate burnout with in-training physicians, such as wellness workshops, workload modifications (e.g., increased diversity of work duties), and better stress management education or appropriate emotional intelligence training.

    As individuals, we have our own behavioral interventions to make: meditation, counseling, etc. Social interventions matter, too, especially when promoting our professional relationships. We can’t forget the importance of exercise and other physical activity either.

    If not addressed, the risks of burnout are myriad. In addition to increased cardiovascular disease and inflammatory biomarkers, burnout elevates rates of depression and suicidal ideation. Thankfully, plans and attempts in burnout states do tend to decline with recovery.

    Importantly, clinician depersonalization is associated with lower patient satisfaction and longer post discharge patient recovery time. So, we need to be able to identify elements of burnout—in ourselves and in others.

    Physical symptoms:

    • Insomnia
    • Change in appetite
    • Fatigue
    • Colds or flu
    • Headaches
    • Gastrointestinal distress

    Psychological symptoms:

    • Low or irritable mood
    • Cynicism
    • Decreased concentration
    • Can negatively affect productivity and rapport

    Additional elements:

    • Daydreaming
    • Procrastination
    • Increased alcohol or drug use

    Recommended Reading:

    The Moral Crisis of America’s Doctors | New York Times

    Back from Burnout: Confronting the Post-Pandemic Physician Turnover Crisis (mgma.com)

    Addressing Health Worker Burnout: U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on Building a Thriving Workforce (nih.gov)

    A Blueprint for Organizational Strategies To Promote the Well-being of Health Care Professionals | NEJM Catalyst

    Estimating the Attributable Cost of Physician Burnout in the United States – PubMed (nih.gov)

    Preventing a Parallel Pandemic — A National Strategy to Protect Clinicians’ Well-Being | New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org)

    Physician Well-being 2.0: Where Are We and Where Are We Going? – Mayo Clinic Proceedings

    Ralph Drosten, MD

    Professor, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona
    Tenured Professor, Creighton University Medical School

    Dr. Drosten’s ARRS “Sound of Wellness” Playlist Selection:

    Delibes

    Tchaikovsky

    Mendelssohn

    You may also be interested in
    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/09/20/words-sounds-of-wellness-dr-sherry-wang/
  • Why We Miss Things: The Science of Perception

    Why We Miss Things: The Science of Perception

    Medical errors are common and can affect overall patient care. Radiology is integral in many aspects of overall patient care, and radiologists play a critical role. As such, radiologists can affect patient morbidity and mortality as a consequence of diagnostic error. Radiologists must recognize common forms of bias and become familiar with methods (both internal and external) to minimize them. 

    Diagnostic errors account for a significant cause of patient morbidity and mortality and are an understandable source of anxiety for patients, clinicians, and radiologists alike. The contribution of cognitive bias to diagnostic errors within radiology is well de- scribed, with Garland [1] first discussing differences in interpretations of chest radiographs. Since then, research has delved into the potential causes of diagnostic error and provided insight and a framework for understanding the basis of these errors and potential avenues for mitigation [2].

    Cognitive Processes

    Kanehman’s [3] Nobel prize-winning work first described critical concepts to understand cognition. In this framework, decision making can be divided into type 1 thinking (heuristics) and type 2 thinking (logic). Type 1 thinking is quick and involves mental shortcuts [4]; it is the muscle memory or gut reaction thinking necessary to accommodate the flood of millions of bits of sensory information processed by the brain at any given moment. Type 1 thinking allows one to make split-second decisions using limited available information, often based on experience, but it is also highly susceptible to cognitive bias. Type 2 thinking is slower and more deliberate. It is often used in completely novel situations. In radiology, an analogy would be the amount of time spent re- viewing a head CT study for the first time by a 1st-year radiology resident. The student would spend a significantly longer time reviewing the study, looking slowly and intentionally for each structure (type 2 thinking), potentially with an inefficient search pattern. Compare this to the amount of type spent by an experienced attending radiologist reviewing the same head CT study. Search patterns in this practitioner have become automatic (type 1 thinking) with attention to high-yield areas for pathologic entities and common blind spots that is based on experience. This muscle memory interpretation is what allows speed and efficiency, but it may also open the door to cognitive errors in diagnosis. A further challenge is that type 1 thinking becomes more common as an individual gets older, as more and more processes become compartmentalized [4]. Although this shift allows greater efficiency, it also creates greater opportunity for cognitive error.

    Errors can occur at any time in the process, from initial perception to final image interpretation. In addition to internal fac- tors, systemic sources can also contribute to diagnostic errors in medicine [4, 5]. In this post, common errors along the path from initial perception to final interpretation will be reviewed and potential means for mitigating diagnostic errors will be discussed.

    Perceptual Error

    Errors in perception account for a large majority of interpretive errors in radiology. A number of factors contribute to errors in perception such as overall lesion conspicuity, including degree of contrast and border demarcation from adjacent soft tissue [5, 6].

    Interpretive Error

    More than 30 types of cognitive bias have been described [7]. The most commonly encountered forms of bias in diagnostic im- aging include anchoring bias, confirmation bias, framing bias, availability bias, premature closure, inattentional blindness, and hindsight bias. 

    Anchoring Bias

    Also known as focalism, anchoring bias refers to the common human tendency to place undue influence or anchor on an initial diagnostic impression, despite later information to the contrary [5, 8, 9]. A radiologist’s initial gut reaction to a case, possibly made with limited initial information, can be difficult to deviate from and can potentially lead to useful information being disregarded. 

    Confirmation Bias

    Conceptually related to anchoring bias is confirmation bias. In this case, data supporting an initially suspected diagnosis are sought, and contrary information is given less significance [8, 9]. As a result, diagnoses can be delayed, and potentially unnecessary procedures can be performed [10]. Further, this type of bias may also be encountered in the academic setting with attending radiologist review of preliminary reports by radiology trainees [11].  

    Framing Bias

    In framing bias, different final diagnostic impressions can be made with the same information depending on the presentation of initial clinical information. In clinical context, different conclusions can be drawn from the same imaging study depending on the provided clinical history [10, 12]. Preliminary clinical history can be limited and potentially misleading [13, 14]. Further, the specialty of the referring physician may also be an influencing fac- tor [10].  

    Availability Bias

    In cases of availability bias, recent in- formation is given undue influence in di- agnostic decision making [15]. Recently missed diagnoses may linger in the mind of a radiologist and allow him or her to attribute a rare diagnosis in a case that they may otherwise have not. For example, a radiologist labels a case as “septic arthritis with osteomyelitis” on elbow MRI, only later to find that the case was acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This error might lead the radiologist to diagnose leukemia on more routine cases of osteomyelitis, even with confirmatory laboratory and clinical findings sup- porting that diagnosis [9]. On the opposite end of the spectrum is the concept of non- availability bias; that is, diagnoses that are rarely encountered are rarely considered [9]. A variation of this bias is alliterative error, or satisfaction of report, commonly encountered in radiology as a repeat of a prior report’s impression, even if this might not have been interpreted in the same way de novo. This error has been reported as the fifth most common cause of diagnostic errors by Kim and Mansfield [16].  

    Premature Closure

    Premature closure, the interpretation of initial conclusions as being final, is the overall most common type of error within clinical medicine [12, 17]. This er- ror includes the concept of satisfaction of search, in which an interpretive process is considered finished once an initial abnormality or finding is identified.

    Inattentional Blindness

    In the case of inattentional blindness, findings may be missed owing to their un- expected nature or their location at the periphery of the image. Corner shot findings on a radiograph or findings on the final im- ages of a cine clip of an ultrasound are examples of potential causes of inattentional blindness [16, 18–20].  

    Hindsight Bias

    Hindsight bias is described as the tendency to de-emphasize the difficulty in making an initial diagnosis after the fact. This bias can occur in group settings including tumor boards, clinical conferences, and medicolegal settings and can prevent realistic assessment of challenges faced with complex initial diagnoses [9, 21].

    External Factors

    Interruptions are a common occurrence in a busy practice with visiting clinicians, telephone interruptions, and technologist requests. In the face of these interruptions it is easy for radiologists to lose their trains of thought and potentially deviate unknowingly from their typical search patterns. These interruptions have been shown to lengthen interpretation times and reduce accuracy in abnormal cases [22, 23].

    Methods of Mitigation

    Metacognition

    A potential means of partially addressing cognitive bias is the concept of meta- cognition; that is, an individual can evaluate one’s own thought processes [22]. Metacognition involves introspection of one’s thought processes and seeking out- side perspectives.  

    Minimizing Interruptions

    Although radiologists must balance pro- viding high-level service to referring clinicians with efficient use of their time, methods for minimizing interruptions are critical [5, 16]. Employing reading room assistants to field and triage calls can provide a first line of screening for telephone calls to aid in reducing interruptions [24]. Further use of text messaging services can also allow radiologists to communicate findings efficiently and document exact conversations [25].

    Structured Reporting

    Structured reporting provides a check- list-style framework for reporting that al- lows reminders for interpreting radiologists to review all relevant anatomy. For trainees, this process also allows the development of desired interpretive search patterns [26].  

    Radiologic-Pathologic Review

    Follow-up on challenging cases either through quality-control conferences, tumor boards, or personal review of cases is critical for improving and expanding radiologists’ interpretive skills. Supportive and educationally oriented environments can allow meaningful discussion and review of diagnostically challenging cases.  

    Computer-Aided Diagnostics

    Use of increasingly powerful means of computer-aided image interpretation pro- vides another potential tool for radiologists to improve diagnostic accuracy and increase confidence. The current effective- ness of computer-aided detection within areas such as mammography has not been shown to be improved over interpretation without computer-aided detection [27]. However, there is growing potential for ap- plications in multiple other areas with use of neural network–based approaches [28].

    The impact of bias in radiologic interpretation can be substantial, with potential implications in patient outcomes. Better understanding the forms of bias, related to both internal and external pressures, can allow radiologists to implement methods for mitigating these biases.

    REFERENCES

    1. Garland LH. Studies on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1959; 82:25–38
    2. Degnan AJ, Ghobadi EH, Hardy P, et al. Percep- tual and interpretive error in diagnostic radiology: causes and potential solutions. Acad Radiol 2019; 26:833–845
    3. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under un- certainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974; 185:1124–1131
    4. Durr T. Thinking, fast and slow by Daniel Kahneman. (book review) Am J Educ 2014; 120:287–291
    5. Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, Fuchs T, Kolla S, Reede D. Interpretive error in radiology. AJR 2017; 208:739–749
    6. Patel SH, Stanton CL, Miller SG, Patrie JT, Itri JN, Shepherd TM. Risk factors for perceptual-versus- interpretative errors in diagnostic neuroradiology. AJNR 2019; 40:1252–1256
    7. Rosenkrantz AB, Bansal NK. Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characteriza- tion based on report addenda. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:1793–1799
    8. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med 2003; 78:775–780
    9. Croskerry P. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9:1184–1204
    10. Busby LP, Courtier JL, Glastonbury CM. Bias in radi- ology: the how and why of misses and misinterpre- tations. RadioGraphics 2018; 38:236–247
    11. Nanapragasam A, Bhatnagar P, Birchall D. Trainee radiologist reports as a source of confirmation bias in radiology. Clin Radiol 2018; 73:1052–1055
    12. Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE. Cognitive and system factors contributing to diag- nostic errors in radiology. AJR 2013; 201:611–617
    13. Gunderman RB, Phillips MD, Cohen MD. Improving clinical histories on radiology requisitions. Acad Radiol 2001; 8:299–303
    14. Loy CT, Irwig L. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information. JAMA 2004; 292:1602–1609
    15. Dumitrescu A, Ryan CA. Addressing the taboo of medical error through IGBOs: I got burnt once! Eur J Pediatr 2014; 173:503–508
    16. Kim YW, Mansfield LT. Fool me twice: delayed diag- noses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. AJR 2014; 202:465–470
    17. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic er- ror in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med 2005; 65:1493–1499
    18. Drew TH, Võ ML, Wolfe JM. The invisible gorilla strikes again. Psychol Sci 2013; 24:1848–1853
    19. Beanland V, Pammer K. Gorilla watching: effects of exposure and expectations on inattentional blind- ness. In: 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science. Sydney, Australia: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, 2010:12–20
    20. Drew TH, Vo ML, Olwal A, Jacobson F, Seltzer SE, Wolfe JM. Scanners and drillers: characterizing ex- pert visual search through volumetric images. J Vis 2013; 13:3
    21. Gunderman RB. Biases in radiologic reasoning. AJR 2009; 192:561–564
    22. Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inqui- ry. Am Psychol 1979; 34:906–911
    23. Wynn RM, Howe JL, Kelahan LC, Fong A, Filice RW, Ratwani RM. The impact of interruptions on chest radiograph interpretation: effects on reading time and accuracy. Acad Radiol 2018; 25:1515–1520
    24. Ngo  JS,  Maxfield  CM,  Schooler  GR.  The  current state of radiology call assistant triage programs among US radiology residency programs. Acad Radiol 2018; 25:250–254
    25. Torres A, Milov DE, Melendez D, Negron J, Zhao JJ, Lawless ST. A new approach to alarm manage- ment: mitigating failure-prone systems. J Hosp Adm 2014; 3:79–83
    26. Marcovici PA, Taylor GA. Structured radiology re- ports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports. AJR 2014; 203:1265–1271
    27. Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DSM, Kerlikowske K, Tosteson ANA, Miglioretti DL. Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and with- out computer-aided detection. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175:1828
    28. Taylor AG, Mielke C, Mongan J. Automated detection of moderate and large pneumothorax on frontal chest X-rays using deep convolutional neural networks: a retrospective study. PLoS Med 2018; 15:e1002697

    Jesse Courtier, MD

    Department of Radiology

    UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital

  • Auto Sapiens: My New Assistant

    Auto Sapiens: My New Assistant

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has been likened to a new species, “Auto Sapiens.” I know this is wild, but bear with me—it may actually help us “get along,” “collaborate,” and “lead” AI to improve radiology practice.

    A recent Harvard Business Review article by Jeremy Heimans and Henry Timms explained Auto Sapiens: AI is able to act autonomously, make decisions, learn from experience, and operate without continuous human supervision, hence “Auto.” Also, AI possesses knowledge and the ability to make judgments in context, hence “Sapiens.” It is hard to think of Auto Sapiens when it’s software running on your data, but it is valid considering this terminology when thinking of AI used in humanoid robots.

    As a thought exercise, let’s think of radiology AI as an Auto Sapiens, and a coworker in the role of an “assistant.” Is this assistant going to take our jobs? Will it (they?) help us in our jobs, and could it make radiology practice more profitable? I say, no, to taking our jobs. And, yes, to helping us change our practice for the better.

    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/09/08/the-workplace-revolution

    Here is how: I believe that AI will not displace radiologists. Somebody needs to be liable for mistakes made by AI. Medical malpractice can be established when physicians deviate from the profession’s standard of patient care. If a radiologist uses an AI-enabled medical device for diagnosis or treatment of a patient, and their use deviates from an established standard of care, the physician could be liable for improper use of that AI medical device. As of now, the radiologist must independently review the AI’s recommendations, applying the standard of care in treating the patient regardless of the AI’s output. After all, AI is an assistant needing supervision, right?

    Holding AI developers liable is quite difficult. One would have to prove that the AI was defective at the time of product purchase by the user and did not become corrupt as it continued to train itself on user data. There are currently no sufficient industry standards to address this.

    I doubt that insurers would take liability; they lack the expertise to minimize liability should an AI application go awry. Radiologists are the ones assuring AI performs consistently in accordance with their intended purpose and scope, as well as at the desired level of precision. Insurers do not have the expertise to check on radiology AI applications’ correctness, relevance, robustness, or interpretability. Radiologists will be the stewards of quality assurance for AI.

    I do, however, wonder about a threat to reimbursements. It is conceivable that AI can evolve to perform better than radiologists—faster and with fewer errors. In that event, insurers could cut physician fees. We need to think about reimbursements in the AI era. Will there be a new component to the fee schedule, such as “AI supervision,” which entails auditing and supervising AI? We will need to continuously “invest” in our AI assistants to make sure they are trained up to the latest technological standard.

    OK, now that I’ve argued how AI will not replace radiologists, let’s see how our new assistants will help us. First, Auto Sapiens, like a good assistant, will happily do all the stuff many of us like less about our jobs, such as reading endless chest radiographs, scrutinizing CT images for lung nodules, measuring lesions and transcribing measurements into reports, and so many other things. Yes, I want this assistant, like, now!

    Additionally, Auto Sapiens will also help us decrease errors of perception and interpretation and delays for reporting incidental critical results, such unexpected intracranial hemorrhage on a nonemergent head CT. What is not to like about this type of assistant? Maybe liability insurance payments will even come down?

    And all of this can result in a more profitable business? Sure, as soon as AI enables radiologists, technologists, and imaging equipment to handle larger volumes, there could be a massive increase of imaging orders. Dream on, though, if you think that decision support will help us control imaging utilization. Imaging is already being used in lieu of a thorough clinical exam. In fact, Dr. Joseph Alpert called the physical exam “an ancient ritual” in 2019.

    So, the AI assistant can help us grow our business and focus on work we enjoy, like making a diagnosis and providing excellent services to physicians and patients. However, this model relies on us being proper supervisors to our AI assistants. As Curtis Langlotz, MD, PhD, once put it: “AI won’t replace radiologists, but radiologists who use AI will replace those who don’t.”

    The time to learn about AI is now, and I am excited about it!

    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/01/06/bye-bye-work-life-balance-welcome-work-life-integration

    Nadja Kadom, MD

    Director for Quality, Department of Radiology, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
    Interim Director for Quality, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory Healthcare
    Professor, Emory University School of Medicine

  • Words of Wellness: Lauren M.B. Burke

    Words of Wellness: Lauren M.B. Burke

    I am an abdominal radiologist and professor of radiology and urology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In my current role of executive vice chair, I have worked on several initiatives to improve work-life balance across all members of the team: faculty, residents, and staff.

    In my view, small tweaks can lead to great improvement. Optimization of worklists to equalize efforts and/or allow for flexibility or remote interpretation has been key to finding that balance of teaching, clinical acuity, and clinical load for our team. These tweaks allow faculty to have autonomy and flexibility in their work and daily lives.

    Efforts to help physicians practice at their level are equally important. Automation of protocols, software to propagate measurements from ultrasound examinations straight to reports, and motivated staff to help relay and close the loop on incidental findings are all examples of such efforts. It’s a constant work-in-progress that requires a unified team with open and honest communication between all team members.

    Lauren M.B. Burke, MD, FSAR

    Executive Vice Chair

    Professor of Radiology and Urology

    Department of Radiology

    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    In “Words of Wellness” on www.radfyi.org/, members of the ARRS Wellness Subcommittee share what “wellness” and “wellbeing” mean in their own clinical practices, research focuses, and everyday lives.

    Dr. Burke’s ARRS “Sound of Wellness” Playlist Selection:

    Carolina In My Mind

    You may also be interested in
    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/09/20/words-sounds-of-wellness-dr-sherry-wang/
  • The Teamwork Imperative

    The Teamwork Imperative

    Over the last few years, we in radiology have faced incredible and unprecedented challenges in our day-to-day work, and this is true regardless of our specific work environments. Why? The pandemic, which has touched everyone and has had a profound impact on the workplace in general. It has changed how we work, approach work, and shaped our opinions of work. And it is not just the pandemic. It is political polarization, social unrest, changes in home life and education, the remote work life. The pandemic and its effects led to a great resignation, and as a result, many of our sites are now understaffed. It has been reported that one in five doctors plan to leave their current practice in two years; two in five nurses plan to leave their practice in two years; one in three doctors expect to work less next year.

    Health care workers have far greater demands now than in the pre-pandemic times. The delivery of health care has changed dramatically and quickly over the last few years. There is unprecedented “consumerism” in medicine now with a mandate to improve and rethink patient access, to provide more and better mental health services to our populations, and to have transparent pricing. Many health systems are facing financial challenges.

    In radiology, whether you work in a large or small private practice, remotely by yourself, an academic department in a medical center, or part of a mega-radiology practice, there has been a palpable shortage of radiologists. This shortage is fueled by a trend toward exclusive subspecialization with declining numbers of radiologists who can handle general work, ever-increasing expectations for service to our patients, referring docs, hospitals and health care systems. There is a desire by radiologists to have more flexible work hours or, simply stated, to work less hours overall compared to previous years. There is a concern about what role artificial intelligence and machine learning will play. Will we be displaced? And reimbursement has been decreasing relative to inflation and compared with other specialties. As a result of these realities and others, there is clear evidence of burnout among radiologists, similar to health care workers in other specialties. In addition, sometimes we find that the leaders in our organizations may be distant, or too corporate, or suffer from “toxic positivity,” which may be worse than “toxic negativity.”

    There has been a steady headwind for years, but it now feels like a gale-force wind. And a lot of this feels out of our control.

    One strategy to manage the headwinds and one that we can embrace and control is to develop a culture of teams within our workplaces. Establish teams as a core value within your workplace. If we have a culture of teams, we can mitigate and shield ourselves from some of these headwinds.

    When I refer to teams, I am specifically not referring to the “macro teams” that many of us find ourselves in. For example, at Duke Health, my hospital system, it is said that the 30,000-plus employees are my “teammates.” That very well may be true. But no, I am referring to your local and focal team. I am referring to the individuals that you rely on daily or weekly to deliver your work product. It’s the folks you huddle with. And the teams develop where you huddle. If you are in training, I am referring to your team of co-residents, your chief residents, maybe your program director or coordinator who you lean on. If you are in a private practice, I am referring to those that you share physical space with, or perhaps switch call with, or the individuals you show difficult cases to, or the referring docs you have developed close relationships with, and who rely on you to deliver care.In an academic environment, it might be the members of your subspecialty division. If done well, the division pulls together as a team to deliver care, service, teaching, and research. Those divisions that have a culture of team are far more effective than those who are unable to act as a team. It’s The Teamwork Imperative.

    If you are lucky enough to have these local and focal teams (and these often form and evolve organically), many challenges at work open up and become more manageable and attainable. The clouds begin to lift. Specifically, your deliverables, whatever they may be, are far more easily and effectively achieved if you have your team, and approach your work from the perspective of a team. Work becomes more efficient, fulfilling, and, frankly, more fun. The work becomes more manageable—with more aspects in your control. You become more engaged. And that then becomes an antidote to burnout. Teams, therefore, contribute to retention.

    Communication in the workplace is critical to developing teams. Of course, communication is about sharing news back and forth, accurately and honestly, but more importantly, communication is to be able to probe, to be able to respectfully question, and to be able to expect honest answers from your teammates. Sometimes, the questions aren’t easy, and the answers may not be easy either. To foster an effective team requires the ability and the safety of pointing out the opportunities—those ones are easy.More important, it is to have safety in pointing out deficiencies—those are more difficult. It is critical for teammates to be able to receive and internalize the information coming from within the group, whether it is a kudo or whether it is an observation, or whether it is a deficiency or a criticism.

    You have to talk to each other. Actually talk. And in a world of remote work and texting, we don’t talk enough. Maybe the talking occurs in a partner meeting, in a defined clinical case conference, or in a resident, division, or department meeting. Maybe it is your team taking a coffee break or going for a midday walk to achieve “steps” goals. Hopefully, the team dynamics are such that one can tap a teammate on the shoulder and engage in an effective and safe conversation.

    Communication needs to be practiced. That is why standing, regular, in-person meetings, even if the agenda is light, are very important. The opportunity to come together regularly promotes the importance and expectation of communication. It is habit forming. You get better at it.

    The communication must be honest with an expectation for mutual trust. Trust means telling the truth, and telling it sooner rather than later; knowing that within a team, that can be hard.It can be hard because so many of us struggle with confrontation and conflict and try to avoid them.

    Honest and fair difficult conversations almost always produce results. If you can get through the first 30 seconds of a difficult conversation, often the clouds lift and a very productive conversation follows. For me, I need to write down the key first few sentences for that opening 30 seconds and the rest flows. If difficult conversations don’t produce results, you have learned something.

    Communicating in person is far more effective than in an email or text. Personal communication often fosters human connections and colleagueship. Time spent with each other, sharing aspects of ourselves, results in caring. The time may be as simple as grabbing a cup of coffee together or asking someone about their weekend. Caring strengthens the interconnective web between team members, making the team softer in a positive way, and more personable, yet, at the same time stronger.

    And this is whyI worry about remote work. I understand well thatthe pandemic has shown that we can do radiology effectively, even remotely. People like it and expect it. And we have learned that we can teach remotely. But it seems far more difficult to foster a genuine, caring environment when work is dispersed in many geographic locales and individuals work essentially independently, free of meaningful, direct interactions with other teammates, other humans.To me, the same applies to Zoom meetings. All the nuanced talk and greetings pre- and post-meeting are lost. The body language is lost. The sense of community is lost, or at least different. And I think the effectiveness of the meeting suffers. Indeed, on a Zoom meeting, you can’t even have real eye contact. I worry that with remote work, the culture of our teams may be eroded.

    So, work to develop teams in your workplace. Together, as a team, we are stronger. And this is something within our control. There is an imperative to create, sustain, and grow teams in our radiology workplace.

    Erik K. Paulson, MD

    Chair, Radiology

    Duke University

  • Words & Sounds of Wellness: Dr. Sherry Wang

    Words & Sounds of Wellness: Dr. Sherry Wang

    Sherry Wang, MBBS, FRANZCR

    @drsherrywang

    I am an abdominal radiologist in the abdominal and ultrasound divisions at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Being a radiologist, I have found much of my source of unwellness and burnout tend to be psychological, rather than physical. There is a lot of mental burden, and it is no surprise that radiology is the most mentally demanding physician specialty with increasing workload contributing to burnout.  

    Music is something I have always enjoyed, and I’ve curated a “Wellness Playlist”—songs for those mentally tougher days in the reading room. Music has been found to improve mood and decrease anxiety and cortisol levels, even improving depression. Physiologically, music can decrease blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. In particular, listening to peaceful and low tempo music has been found to decrease heart rate. There are times in the reading room where I find it useful to have relaxing music to help decrease anxiety and irritation, as well as calm down. However, there are days where I want and need to get pumped up to help tackle a rougher day, just like getting pumped up at the gym for a workout. In fact, motivational music has been shown to combat cognitive and physical performance decline caused by exercise fatigue in sports. The other factor in this study by Bentouati et al. that showed to combat cognitive and physical decline was a 30-minute nap. This also showcases the importance and power of sleep, which we are all very aware of in mitigating burnout and unwellness. Since we are on the topic of sleep, listening to relaxing music has been found to be as effective as diazepam in reducing anxiety, and thus beneficial for aiding sleep. Music can lower our blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate to help us fall asleep and achieve quality sleep, further boosting our wellness.  

    In “Words of Wellness” on www.radfyi.org/, members of the ARRS Wellness Subcommittee share what “wellness” and “wellbeing” mean in their own clinical practices, research focuses, and everyday lives.

    Top 3 Songs from Dr. Wang’s Motivational Playlist for Wellness:

    1. “Rise Up” by Andra Day

    “I’ll rise unafraid.”  

    2. “Fight Song” by Rachel Platten

    “This is my fight song
    Take back my life song
    Prove I’m alright song
    My power’s turned on
    Starting right now I’ll be strong
    I’ll play my fight song
    And I don’t really care if nobody else believes
    ‘Cause I’ve still got a lot of fight left in me”  

    3. “Hero” by Mariah Carey

    “So when you feel like hope is gone
    Look inside you and be strong
    And you’ll finally see the truth
    That a hero lies in you”

    You may also be interested in
    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/02/15/words-of-wellness-katia-dodelzon/
  • The Workplace Revolution

    The Workplace Revolution

    HELP, I am getting old! I can look back at my time in the workplace and remember how different things used to be. And while changes in the workplace have mostly been gradual over decades, the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have had a catalytic effect.

    I do, however, much prefer my new workplace environment over the past, and I am painfully aware that—for many readers—my current workplace is still a workplace of the “future.”

    Here’s where I am at:

    I have flexibility of my work hours in that we have shifts spanning different hours throughout the day, currently 7 am to 10 pm. While I cannot just choose on a daily basis which shift I am working, or even drop in whenever I feel like it, I much enjoy the ability to choose shifts that best accommodate my personal life. Also, I now have the flexibility of working from home. Although I cannot choose on any given day whether I work from home or not, certain shifts (day, evening, and weekend) allow me to do so, if that is my preferred way to work. On those days, my husband (who is a 100% remote worker) and I share the apartment as officemates. Fun!

    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/01/06/bye-bye-work-life-balance-welcome-work-life-integration

    Technology enables me to be more efficient; for example, manage emails anywhere and anytime from my smart devices and easily collaborate on shared files, while protecting my organization’s need for data security. Fancy applications, like video conferencing, surveying, and data visualization, are easily accessible to me through my organization. A nerd’s dream come true…

    My work environment is defined by democracy, information sharing, learning, and collaboration. Our section makes decisions jointly, and each voice is heard. We transitioned from random score-based peer review to peer learning. And performance assessment is no longer based on knowledge agreement or RVUs, but focuses on engagement, such as participation in peer learning and educational feedback to technologists. We share information daily in an online chat that includes all radiologists and trainees on service at any location within our system. Each day, we collaborate: sharing interesting cases online, consulting each other for second opinions, taking turns in providing a teaching session.

    Our work and our career paths are becoming more customized. I am interested in Quality and Safety, and I am being given the opportunity to pursue this as my professional career. Others can nurture interests in education, research, or information technology to become leaders in those areas.

    https://www.radfyi.org/2022/09/26/leadership-styles-radiology-teams

    These are amazing improvements taking place in our work environments. Since 2015 or so, we are said to be living through the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which is defined by cyber systems, machine learning and artificial intelligence, cloud technology, social media, a focus on human-machine interactions, deployment of nanoparticles, and a shift towards sustainability. Self-actualization is a big part of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, resulting in wokeness with regards to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    Technology developments are the major drivers of the previous Industrial Revolutions, hence the name “Industrial.” But isn’t technology developed by humans? And aren’t these humans driven by simply wanting to make our lives better? In some way, each Industrial Revolution has propelled society further up Maslow’s pyramid of needs. Mostly in developed countries, we have surpassed the stage where our livelihoods serve physiological needs, such as food and shelter; we have gained safety and security through advances in technology and science; we opened new pathways to filling social needs, such as a sense of belonging and social networking, and we are now able to achieve self-actualization for ourselves and others.

    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/06/12/radiology-sustainability-lets-start-here

    This is too rosy a picture for you? You are right. Each Industrial Revolution has also had negative effects, such as unsafe working conditions in early factories, unhealthy living conditions in overcrowded cities, a greater divide between the wealthy and poor, fake news, and now a threat that AI will overpower humanity.

    So, why did I write all of this? I had a thought that the change we are living is an opportunity and responsibility, maybe even an obligation. We are given the tools to decrease radiologist burnout—let’s use them! We are given the opportunity to improve patient care through machine learning and AI—let’s go for that! We can practice radiology with a more sustainable footprint—let’s rise to this challenge. We can afford equity—let’s invest in that.  

    The third Industrial Revolution was named the “Digital” Revolution. Let’s make sure that history will give a positive name to our fourth Industrial Revolution.

    Nadja Kadom, MD

    Director for Quality, Department of Radiology, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
    Interim Director for Quality, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory Healthcare
    Professor, Emory University School of Medicine

  • Radiology Sustainability—Let’s Start Here!

    Radiology Sustainability—Let’s Start Here!

    Living more sustainably has been on my mind recently, and I believe other radiologists may be interested, given our dedication to health care and wellbeing. As a radiologist, we play a crucial role in diagnosing and treating patients, and I strongly believe we can do even more.

    Radiology, being an essential component of modern health care, has its environmental impact, particularly in terms of energy consumption and waste generation. However, I believe there are opportunities for positive change. By adopting sustainable practices in our radiology departments, we can reduce our ecological footprint and contribute to a healthier planet.

    I’d love to discuss potential initiatives we could undertake together, such as our use of iodinated contrast media (ICM). ICMs accumulate as waste (residual in vials and tubing) and are released into the sewage system by patients who received ICMs. While ICMs are of low toxicity, they may be transformed into other chemicals when undergoing wastewater treatment, and/or drinking water purification. Those byproducts may pose a risk for the aquatic environment and our drinking water.

    Following the shortage of iodinated contrast agents during the pandemic, many radiology practices had to adopt practices to decrease the use and waste of iodinated IV contrast. Why not adjust contrast volume for each patient based on body weight, lean body mass, or body surface? Certain imaging techniques can allow reduced IV contrast volumes, currently mostly used for patients with renal disease: low-kV techniques, dual-energy scanning with reconstruction of low-keV images, and contrast boost technique for CT angiography.

    Using multi-patient injection systems for bottle sizes up to 500 ml can make IV contrast administration even more efficient by individualizing the amount of contrast material injected without increasing contrast waste. Yes, true, it may require some planning ahead of the imaging day to do this efficiently.

    Changing habits can be difficult. Do you switch the lights off when you leave a room in your home? At work? It’s tough to remember to do it. It often feels like a big effort to change habits, and it is unclear whether a small contribution can make a difference.

    Hang in here—the 1% rule (“rule of marginal gains”) is the idea that big goals can be achieved through small steps. No need for making big changes overnight. Instead, let’s aim for small daily improvements.

    The three “r”s of sustainability—reduce, reuse, recycle—translate to radiology, and there are a few low-hanging fruits worth considering. What about adopting environmentally friendly practices that also save money? Rethinking how we administer iodinated contrast can be a feasible first step.

    More reading:

    Tackling the increasing contamination of the water supply by iodinated contrast media

    https://www.radfyi.org/2022/09/26/leadership-styles-radiology-teams/
    https://www.radfyi.org/2023/01/06/bye-bye-work-life-balance-welcome-work-life-integration/

    Nadja Kadom, MD

    Director for Quality, Department of Radiology, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
    Interim Director for Quality, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory Healthcare
    Professor, Emory University School of Medicine