Author: Logan Young

_{Published February 22, 2023}

Who is the best lecturer you have ever watched in radiology? Who else comes to mind when you think of amazing educators throughout your radiology career?

When you think of those individuals, and then think about the teaching you do, do you sort of think to yourself, “gosh, I am not that good, and I could never be that good?”

Well, I have some good news for you: those amazing lecturers did not start off that way. None of them. I promise. Great teachers, in radiology and other fields, may have some innate talent, but all great lecturers learned through mentors, feedback, and/or trial and error how to get better, to the point of being great. There are too many aspects to becoming an amazing teacher for it all to happen by chance. Some of the great pioneers in radiology education may not have had formal instruction in pedagogy, but at a minimum, they all were probably attuned to incorporating direct and indirect feedback. And they probably had a strong internal process of improving.

So, how can you get better at teaching, if you really want to be great?

First, Seek Formal Resources

Thankfully, there are many well-written resources available throughout the radiology literature. For example, see Heller and Silva’s excellent primer in the Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR) for delivering a presentation that is informative, notable, and even inspiring [1].

One of the best initiatives is ARRS’ own Clinician Educator Development Program (CEDP) [2]. Each year, up to 30 ARRS CEDP recipients are selected to receive a travel grant to attend a specialized on-site workshop during the ARRS Annual Meeting. With a curriculum promising increased proficiency in instructional skills, as well as educational activity design, the CEDP remains a highly interactive day of learning. Focusing on new and emerging pedagogical tools, while improving already acquired clinical acumen, over half of this expertly curated syllabus consists of hands-on learning. Offering a unique opportunity to interact with fellow enthusiastic clinician educators, attendees will engage further with the esteemed faculty ARRS has convened—previous CEDP instructors Travis Henry, MD (Duke) and Aaron Kamer, MD (Indiana), as well as Omer Awan, MD (Maryland), Judith Gadde, DO (Northwestern), and myself—on April 15 during the 2023 Annual Meeting in Honolulu, HI.

Second, Ask for Feedback

If your lectures are part of a series where evaluations are collected, then ask for them. If there is no feedback available, see if you can collect some. Try sending out your own survey perhaps? If all else fails, you can ask for feedback from one or multiple people you know who happen to be in the audience. One great option for garnering constructive feedback is asking a mentor who is talented at teaching to attend your lecture, then give you some notes. I know it seems like an imposition, but a good mentor will do this for you.

Optimally, you are seeking honest answers to the following questions:

• Did you lose your audience? If so, where?
• What didactic points could have been explained better?
• What aspects of your lecture were nearly perfect?
• Are there insights you should keep to use for future talks?

Third, Construct Internal Feedback

Observe lectures from an esteemed imaging educator, asking yourself, “how does this lecture differ from mine?” Experiment with employing a similar style—without copying content, of course—and see if it could work for you. One key observation is that many lectures out there aren’t that great, yet it is incredibly easy to copy the predominant style that is used. Copying a mediocre style will make your lecture just as mediocre, so don’t do that. Look to see what the truly great lecturers in radiology are doing.

To get your improvement process jumpstarted, right off the bat, allow me to share an immediate tip. For JACR, my colleagues and I examined what made a successful lecture, based upon thousands of comments regarding hundreds of lectures given to medical students [3].

What was the characteristic most associated with well-received lectures?  

…Interactivity

Recently noted by AJR, too, the biggest pro tip is interacting with your audience, even if it seems hard or unconventional [4]. You will want to do so in a warm and inviting way, free of condescension. Adding such an interactive element to your teaching will help you forge a stronger connection with all your learners.

References:

1. Heller et al. Preparing and delivering your best radiology lecture. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16:745–748
2. Clinician Educator Development Program. ARRS website. www.ARRS.org/CEDP. Accessed January 17, 2023
3. Jen A, Webb EM, Ahearn B, Naeger DM. Lecture evaluations by medical students: concepts that correlate with scores. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13:72–76
4. Chien BS, Gunderman RB. In-person interactivity’s vital role in radiology education. AJR 2023; 220:1–2

_{Published January 3, 2023}

Imaging findings in radiology are not always black and white; in between, there are multiple shades of gray. One of the key roles of the radiologist is to identify and differentiate true pathology from pathological mimics that can pose a diagnostic challenge in day-to-day clinical practice. As such, it is important to know the normal imaging anatomy of a joint and be aware of some of the typical anatomic variants that can occur. Most anatomic variants are asymptomatic and are seen as incidental findings on imaging. A few anatomic variants, however, can predispose to symptoms under specific circumstances and can cause pain, sensory loss, or restricted joint function. 

In advance of the 2023 ARRS Annual Meeting Categorical Course, “Pitfalls and Challenging Cases: How to Triumph and Make the Diagnosis,” this InPractice article focuses on anatomic variants occurring in and around the elbow and some of the potential pitfalls to be aware of when reading imaging studies. 

Normal Anatomy

The elbow is a complex synovial joint formed by the articulation of the distal humerus, proximal radius, and proximal ulna. The bones form three separate joints—the humeroulnar, radiocapitellar, and proximal radioulnar joints—contained within a single joint capsule lined with synovium and supported by groups of muscles, tendons, and ligaments [1–3]. The humeroulnar joint is a hinge joint formed between the humeral trochlea and the sigmoid notch of the ulna. The sigmoid notch of the ulna (also known as the trochlear notch or groove or semilunar notch) is a crescent-shaped depression along the proximal ulna lined with articular cartilage [1–4]. The radiocapitellar joint is the articulation between the humeral capitellum and radial head. The radial head has a central concavity that allows smooth articulation with the rounded, anteriorly directed capitellum or capitulum of the humerus. The surfaces of both the radial head and capitellum are covered with hyaline cartilage [1, 2]. The proximal radioulnar joint is formed by the radial head and radial notch (or lesser sigmoid notch) of the proximal ulna, which is a shallow depression distal and lateral to the coronoid process [1–3].  

Osseous Anatomic Variants 

Supracondylar Process 

The supracondylar process, or avian spur, is a congenital bony protuberance along the anteromedial aspect of the distal humerus. It ranges in size from 2 to 20 mm and is located 5–7 cm above the medial epicondyle. The spur grows toward the elbow, unlike an osteochondroma, which is directed away from the elbow. A supracondylar process is present in 1–3% of the population, more commonly found in men and boys and on the left [2, 3]. The spur may be connected to the medial epicondyle by a fibrous band called the Struthers ligament, which creates a fibroosseous tunnel. A supracondylar process is usually asymptomatic but can fracture or cause mechanical compression of the median nerve or brachial artery, where the neurovascular bundle passes through the fibroosseous tunnel formed by the supracondylar process and Struthers ligament. The symptoms include pain, paresthesia, and weakness in the distribution of the median nerve and can be aggravated by continuous movement or local compression at the elbow [1, 2]. 

A supracondylar process can be seen on lateral or oblique radiographs obtained with the elbow internally rotated and can be misinterpreted as a bony exostosis or osteochondroma. However, the typical location of the supracondylar process along the anteromedial aspect of the distal humerus and direction of growth toward the joint differentiate it from an osteochondroma, which typically occurs in the metaphysis and grows away from elbow (Fig. 1A). CT angiography can show the supracondylar process and deviation, compression, or thrombosis of the brachial artery (Fig. 1B). MRI and ultrasound can depict the Struthers ligament and any compression on the neurovascular bundle. Surgical decompression is usually the preferred approach over conservative treatment of patients who have symptoms [1–8]. 

Supratrochlear Foramen 

In the supratrochlear portion of the distal humerus, a thin plate of compact bone called the supratrochlear septum usually separates the olecranon and coronoid fossae. This bony septum can be opaque or radiolucent, is lined by a synovial membrane, and is present until approximately age 7. After this time, it is occasionally absorbed, forming a supratrochlear foramen (also known as the olecranon foramen, septal aperture, intercondylar foramen, and epitrochlear foramen) [3]. It is important to report the presence of a supratrochlear foramen (Fig. 2) and provide information about the shape and dimensions, because these factors can influence preoperative planning and surgical outcome. The presence of a supratrochlear foramen is commonly associated with a narrow medullary canal and anterior angulation of the distal humerus and gracile bones, which can predispose to fracture when instrumentation is placed in the distal humerus. Additionally, a large supratrochlear foramen may be misinterpreted as an osteolytic or cystic lesion, if the radiologist is unaware of this normal variant [9–12]. 

Pseudodefect of the Capitellum 

The capitellum is a hemispherical protuberance along the anterior and lateral aspects of the distal humerus. The anterior 180° of the capitellum is round, smooth, and covered by articular cartilage. As the capitellum curves distally and posteriorly, it tapers in width. The posterolateral aspect of the capitellum is devoid of articular cartilage and often has a rough and irregular appearance. A groove is normally present between the posterolateral aspect of the capitellum and the lateral epicondyle [3, 4].  

The abrupt change in contour of the articular capitellum at the junction with the lateral epicondyle can create a pseudodefect of the capitellum on coronal MR images. This finding is more pronounced in contrast to the smooth articular surface of the radial head or in the presence of a joint effusion where fluid outlines the groove. The pseudodefect can simulate an osteochondral lesion, particularly when there is accompanying fibrocystic change. However, the two can easily be distinguished by their anatomic location on sagittal images: the pseudodefect will be along the posterior nonarticular surface of the capitellum (Fig. 3), whereas an osteochondral lesion will be located along the anterior capitellum and is commonly accompanied by subchondral cystic change, bone marrow edema, and a joint effusion [1–4]. 

Pseudodefect of the Trochlear Groove

The trochlear groove is constricted at the junction of the olecranon and coracoid process with inward tapering that results in subtle cortical notches peripherally, which can simulate cortical disruption on sagittal MR images. These pseudodefects of the trochlear groove can simulate a fracture (Fig. 4). However, the well-defined margins, absence of bone marrow edema, and midtrochlear location differentiate the pseudodefect from a true fracture, which usually extends into the medullary cavity [1, 2, 13]. 

Transverse Trochlear Ridges 

The midtrochlear groove is partially or completely traversed by a nonarticular transverse bony ridge at the junction of the olecranon process and coronoid process. The bony ridge is devoid of articular cartilage and best seen on sagittal MR images. The bony elevation may be misinterpreted as an intraarticular osteophyte or sequela of a healed fracture; however, the absence of bone marrow edema and characteristic location help differentiate the midtrochlear groove from pathology [1, 3, 4, 13]. 

Accessory Ossicles  

Patella cubiti—A patella cubiti (also known as an os sesamum cubiti or os sesamoideum tricipitale) is a rare sesamoid bone located within the distal triceps brachii tendon that develops when part of the olecranon or the entire olecranon remains separated from the proximal ulna [3]. On radiographs, the patella cubiti is seen as a well-corticated ossicle with a smooth contour adjacent to the olecranon process. The ossicle can mimic an ununited avulsion fracture of the olecranon tip or a nonunited olecranon apophysis. However, a history of trauma and the presence of irregular sclerotic margins in both the parent bone and fracture fragment favors a chronic fracture. In preadolescent or adolescent athletes involved in overhead throwing activities, such as baseball, a widened physis and sclerotic margins on imaging favor an ununited olecranon apophysis [14–16]. A fractured olecranon enthesophyte or calcium hydroxyapatite deposition in the distal triceps tendon can also mimic a patella cubiti [3].

Os supratrochleare dorsale—The os supratrochleare dorsale is an accessory ossicle found in the olecranon fossa; it is commonly seen in the dominant arm of men and boys age 15–40 [1, 17]. Its appearance has been described as a medallion on a frontal radiograph. This finding is characterized by a thick sclerotic border of bone around an ossicle related to stress changes with a thin rim of surrounding lucency due to deepening of the olecranon fossa. Repetitive impaction by the olecranon process during elbow extension can lead to osseous remodeling or fragmentation of the os with secondary osteoarthritis. It is important to differentiate the os supratrochleare dorsale from its common mimickers, such as patella cubiti, intraarticular joint body, and fragmentation of the olecranon tip in patients with valgus extension overload. Surgical removal is the treatment of choice of both os supratrochleare dorsale and the joint body [1, 17].

Prominent Radial Tuberosity 

The radial tuberosity along the ulnar aspect of the proximal radius serves as the attachment site of the distal biceps tendon. Cancellous bony trabeculae are sparse subjacent to the radial tuberosity and may produce an exuberant or bubbly osseous prominence that can simulate a pathologic lucent lesion when seen en face on radiographs. An adjacent osseous fossa anterolateral to the biceps tendon insertion can also appear lucent when seen en face. Knowledge of the distal biceps insertional anatomy can prevent mistaking this physiologic structure for a lucent bone lesion [18].

Offering 18 total CME credits for ARRS members, the “Pitfalls and Challenging Cases: How to Triumph and Make the Diagnosis” Categorical Course will also tackle challenging cases in abdominal, chest, and neuroradiology. Didactic lectures will emphasize clinical scenarios and interpretative skills across a true diversity of findings, enhancing the radiologist’s role in patient management. Together, we look forward to presenting more information—especially about nonosseous normal variants in elbow imaging—during the “Pitfalls in Upper Extremity in MSK Imaging” session at the ARRS Annual Meeting Categorical Course. Please join us and other expert faculty in Honolulu, virtually, or on demand to help diagnose your future shoulder, wrist, and hand imaging cases, too.  

References

1. Tomsick SD, Petersen BD. Normal anatomy and anatomical variants of the elbow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010; 14:379–393 
2. Stein JM, Cook TS, Simonson S, Kim W. Normal and variant anatomy of the elbow on magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2011; 19:609–619 
3. Antil N, Stevens KJ, Lutz AM. Elbow imaging: variants and asymptomatic findings. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2021; 25:546–557 
4. Rosenberg ZS, Bencardino J, Beltran J. MR imaging of normal variants and interpretation pitfalls of the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1997; 5:481–499 
5. Shon HC, Park JK, Kim DS, Kang SW, Kim KJ, Hong SH. Supracondylar process syndrome: two cases of median nerve neuropathy due to compression by the ligament of Struthers. J Pain Res 2018; 11:803–807 
6. Grayson DE. The elbow: Radiographic imaging pearls and pitfalls. Semin Roentgenol 2005; 40:223–247 
7. Newman A. The supracondylar process and its fracture. AJR 1969; 105:844–849 
8. Pećina M, Borić I, Antičević D. Intraoperatively proven anomalous Struthers’ ligament diagnosed by MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2002; 31:532–535 
9. Singhal S, Rao V. Supratrochlear foramen of the humerus. Anat Sci Int 2007; 82:105–107 
10. Erdogmus S, Guler M, Eroglu S, Duran N. The importance of the supratrochlear foramen of the humerus in humans: an anatomical study. Med Sci Monit 2014; 20:2643–2650 
11. Hirsch IS. On a foramen in the lower extremity of the humerus. Radiology 1928; 10:199–208 
12. Nayak SR, Das S, Krishnamurthy A, Prabhu LV, Potu BK. Supratrochlear foramen of the humerus: an anatomico-radiological study with clinical implications. Ups J Med Sci 2009; 114:90–94 
13. Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Cheung Y, Broker M. MR imaging of the elbow: normal variant and potential diagnostic pitfalls of the trochlear groove and cubital tunnel. AJR 1995; 164:415–418 
14. Mittal R, Kumar VS, Gupta T. Patella cubiti: a case report and literature review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014; 134:467–471 
15. Khomarwut K, Sutthisast W, Vasuntaraporn U, Arpornchayanon O. Bilateral patellar cubiti: a case report. Bangk Med J 2019; 15:91–93 
16. Pavlov H, Torg JS, Jacobs B, Vigorita V. Nonunion of olecranon epiphysis: two cases in adolescent baseball pitchers. AJR 1981; 136:819–820 
17. Obermann WR, Loose HW. The os supratrochleare dorsale: a normal variant that may cause symptoms. AJR 1983; 141:123–127 
18. Freyschmidt J, Sternberg A, Brossmann J, Wiens J. Koehler/Zimmer’s borderlands of normal and early pathological findings in skeletal radiography, 5th ed. Thieme, 2003

Published November 14, 2022

Imagine for a moment a lighthouse, perhaps alone among cold, crashing waves casting light and deep, bellowing sounds for passing ships in the foggy night. A beacon of safety, of hope, a navigation pathway, guiding distant faceless and shrouded ships through dark and treacherous passages into safe harbors and beyond. No expressions of gratitude or appreciation for this pillar of rock and time and relief. Sturdily constructed on a foundation of bedrock, built to survive the daily ebbs of moon-pulled tides and cruelly lashing, crashing cold storms. When activated, light-generated heat escapes from the lantern light room through vent balls on top of the cupola. Passing ship horns are spied from the watching gallery deck, which sits atop the cramped living quarters and the kitchen, repair, exercise, and communications rooms. Our tall tower is constructed to meet the many personal needs of the timeless keeper, all alone. Hanging ladders, spiral stairs, a signaling room, escape exits, and tide-safe entrances provide safety nets of protection against battering tides and time and loneliness

So, where are we going with this analogy? In our opinion, the lighthouse symbolizes the four essential ingredients of a wellbeing strategy: foundational elements, safety nets, as well as cultural and personal wellbeing [Fig. 1].

Let’s consider and expand on components and opportunities encapsulated within the four ingredients below. We invite ARRS members and your colleagues to do the same. For those who might not be experiencing optimal fulfillment in work at this time, do you have your proverbial lighthouse? Might you have colleagues who would clearly benefit from you serving in this capacity?

Foundational Elements

In the clinical imaging realm, foundational elements include a redesign of the work environment itself, as well as reliable assessment tools to provide longitudinal estimates of individual states of wellbeing and the impacts of burnout mitigation efforts. We must recognize that to make real change in individual wellbeing, the foundation must be rebuilt. We are well aware of the impacts of leadership effectiveness (or lack thereof!) on staff morale and burnout [1], and on the importance of building collaborations and providing opportunities for social connections. We can all easily list those several “pebbles in our shoes” that detract from our professional fulfillment and may result in additional negative impacts. An important foundational component is the ability to identify, then remove these pebbles effectively, and to keep them out. Don’t we all aspire to be pebble-removal scientists? Examples of the many recognized “pebbles” in our radiologist’s shoes include call requirements, compensation plans, staffing challenges, malpractice risks, work isolation, job security, low meaning in work, clerical burdens, and inefficient work environment. This list is much longer.

Safety Nets

The stigmas associated with burnout, stress, and mental health among physicians is harmful and underserved.We offer up simple advice: providing top-level care to our patients requires first that we do the same to ourselves. Simply said, always put your own mask on first. Has your practice invested in developing wellbeing peer support? Who really checks in on you at work? Who do you check in on at work, and what training did you receive for this? We’d suggest reminding yourself how to provide stress first aid, both for peer support and self-care [2]. Consider the “first-aid” that a lighthouse provides, correlated with options for managing sources of anxiety in health care professionals during challenging times [3]. We are all experiencing: “hear me, protect me, prepare me, support me, and care for me.”

Personal Dimensions of Wellbeing

An intricate list of dimensions contributes to our overall wellbeing: emotional, psychological, financial, social, spiritual, occupational, physical, intellectual, and environmental. Each of these, while complex and complicated, embraces a wide expanse of opportunities for fostering a state of wellbeing. One cannot just address each individually in isolation, but collectively. For example, the symptoms of burnout include emotional detachment, and might easily overlap those of clinical depression, and both conditions have fundamentally different treatment approaches [4].

Instilling a Culture of Wellbeing

Finally, instilling a culture of wellbeing is not quite as simple as the title suggests. Instilling this culture implies prioritizing employee wellness, being open and transparent about goals, sharing a roadmap of progress, embracing different opinions—especially from our multigenerational workforce [5]—and commitment from and active participation by leaders. Efforts should be made to align values with those of the larger organization. This helps employees to find and experience meaning and joy in work, to build a sense of community and collegiality, to ensure that employees feel valued, to show compassion and appreciation, to ensure that policies support wellbeing, such as flexible work and transparency, to resource and provide efficient workflow solutions, to enable all employees to be heard. The list goes on, of course.

Above, we have briefly addressed the four components of a radiologist wellbeing strategy, certainly not comprehensively, but intended to stimulate conversation, consideration, and contemplation. We are convinced that there will be as many putative suggestions as there are practices. And we plan to continue this conversation this April 16–18, 2023, during the inaugural ARRS Radiology Wellness Summit in Honolulu, HI [6]. A final thought to consider: Is the House of Radiology ready, willing, and resourced to serve as our wellbeing lighthouse?

References:

1. Kadom N. Anything Goes—Is It True for Leadership Styles? ARRS Rad Teams website. RadTeams.org/2022/09/26/leadership-styles-radiology-teams. Published September 1, 2022. Accessed November 9, 2022
2. Westphal RJ, Watson P. Stress First Aid for Health Care Professionals. AMA website. edhub.ama-assn.org/steps-forward/module/2779767. Accessed November 9, 2022
3. Shanafelt T et al. Understanding and addressing sources of anxiety among health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020; 323:2133–2134
4. Sen S. Is it burnout or depression? expanding efforts to improve physician Well-Being. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1629–1630
5. Kruskal J. Thriving in a Multigenerational Workforce. ARRS InPractice website.   www.radfyi.org/multigenerational-workforce-radiology-age-diversity-dei. Published January 5, 2022. Accessed November 9, 2022
6. Kruskal J, Azour L, Goldin J. Introducing the ARRS Radiology Wellness Summit in Hawaii—Time to Get Serious! ARRS InPractice website. www.radfyi.org/radiology-wellness-summit-arrs-2023-hawaii. Published August 1, 2022. Accessed November 9, 2022

_{Published November 4, 2022}

In our current topsy-turvy world, characterized by political divisiveness, challenges to reproductive rights, gun violence, global warming, and the Russia-Ukraine War, how can we improve our state of affairs? With so many problems, where do we begin? Should we just acquiesce and retreat to our comfortable cocoons?

As radiologists and as members of the American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), I believe that we have an obligation to repair and improve the world. Repairing the world is the ancient Jewish concept of tikkun olam—based on acts of kindness. While we may be unable to solve every problem, we can try to repair our world by working towards the betterment of our patients, our colleagues, and ourselves [1].

As we aim to improve our spheres of influence, our three main tools are kindness, improved communication, and flexibility. Kindness goes a long way in establishing human connections. Improved communication can solve a lot of problems, as many problems arise mainly from impaired communication. Flexibility is critical as we try to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic. Just think of all the changes in our lives and our world since January 10, 2020, when the World Health Organization announced that a disease outbreak in Wuhan, China was caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus [2].  Furthermore, flexibility is critical as practice patterns and organizational structures change. John Wooden, the record-setting coach of the men’s basketball team at the University of California, Los Angeles, noted that “things work out best for those who make the best of the ways things turn out” [3].

Working towards the betterment of our patients reinforces the notion that we as radiologists are not film critics; rather, we are physicians actively engaged in clinical care, consulting with other health professionals and advocating for our patients. What we do each and every day—interpreting images and performing image-guided procedures—affects nearly all of our patients in nearly every area of medicine. In other words, our patients and many of our clinical colleagues would be lost without us.  Just think of our role in patient care, with major roles in diagnosis, staging, screening, monitoring response to therapy, predicting prognosis, and risk assessment. In fact, what we as radiologists do every day has a major impact on what treatments are given and what surgeries are performed.

As we go about our daily work, we can always do a better job at doing our jobs, including making life better for our colleagues. Small acts of kindness can have major positive impacts. Even though we are all busy, taking a little time to engage with others can be helpful in establishing a collaborative milieu. As we talk with each other and establish dialogues, we will probably find that we have more in common that we might have thought. Furthermore, you probably do not want to be the person who reaches out to others ONLY when you need something.

As we live our lives, inside and outside of radiology, it is important that we take care of ourselves. In 2022, about half of all practicing radiologists endorsed symptoms of burnout—a state of chronic physical and mental exhaustion, increased negativity or cynicism, and reduced professional efficacy, due to an imbalance between occupational demands and available resources [4, 5]. Burnout may be exacerbated by radiologists’ isolation in an environment with low ambient lighting and pressure to read cases and finalize reports quickly [5].

We need to take care of ourselves, our colleagues, and our patients. If we are physically and mentally exhausted, we will be less effective as radiologists and as members of our communities and our families. I hope that you will join us for the 2023 ARRS Annual Meeting, April 16–20, in beautiful Honolulu, HI (with virtual and on-demand programing). During the Annual Meeting, we will feature the first-ever Radiology Wellness Summit, directed by Drs. Jonathan Kruskal, Lea Azour, and Jonathan Goldin. Our Summit will be a great program, and all of us have a lot to learn about workplace wellness from an individual, as well as an institutional perspective.

Even though our challenges are weighty, we can and should strive to repair and improve the world. With kindness, improved communication, and flexibility, we can make the world better for our patients, our colleagues, and ourselves. In fact, according to the Talmud and the Quran, whoever saves a single life is considered to have saved the whole world [6, 7]. We can and should incorporate tikkun olam into our busy, hectic, unpredictable lives. We can repair the world. Every (small) act helps. The time is now. As Rabbi Hillel said, “if not now, when?” [8].

References

1. Fine L. The Pittsburgh Attack Inspired Calls for Tikkun Olam. What to Know About the Evolution of an Influential Jewish Idea. TIME Magazine website. time.com/5441818/pittsburgh-tikkun-olam-history. Published November 1, 2018. Accessed November 3, 2022
2. CDC Museum COVID-19 Timeline. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/covid19.html. Updated August 16, 2022. Accessed November 3, 2022
3. Impelman C. Make the Best of the Way Things Turn Out. The Wooden Effect website. www.thewoodeneffect.com/make-the-best-of-the-way-things-turn-out. Published October 23, 2019. Accessed November 3, 2022
4. Baggett SM, Martin KL. Medscape Radiologist Lifestyle, Happiness, & Burnout Report 2022. Medscape website. www.medscape.com/slideshow/2022-lifestyle-radiologist-6014784. Published February 18, 2022. Accessed November 3, 2022
5. Le RT, Sifrig B, Chesire D, Hernandez M, Kee-Sampson J, Matteo J, Meyer TE. Comparative analysis of radiology trainee burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory and Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Acad Radiol 2022; 25:S1076-6332(22)00467-6
6. Moskovitz D. Save One Life, Save the Entire World (Including Yourself). Religious Action Center website. rac.org/blog/save-one-life-save-entire-world-including-yourself. Published May 24, 2019. Accessed November 3, 2022
7. Mawdudi SAA. Human Rights in Islam, Chapter 2: Basic Human Rights. Al-Islam website. www.al-islam.org/al-tawhid/vol-4-n-3/human-rights-islam-syed-abul-ala-mawdudi/chapter-2-basic-human-rights. Published May 24, 2019. Accessed November 3, 2022
8. Kansky M. “If I am not for myself, who will be for me?” A discussion for developing a practice of self-care. Hillel International website. www.hillel.org/about/news-views/news-views—blog/news-and-views/2017/02/28/-if-i-am-not-for-myself-who-will-be-for-me-a-discussion-for-developing-a-practice-of-self-care. Published February 28, 2017. Accessed November 3, 2022

_{Published November 4, 2022}

The mission of ARRS’ Global Partner Society (GPS) program is to build long-standing relationships with key leaders and organizations in the worldwide imaging community—increasing awareness of our society’s services in specific nations, while raising the stature of Global Partner Societies among ARRS members. Every year, the ARRS Annual Meeting Global Exchange incorporates one partner society into the educational and social fabric of our meeting. ARRS members then reciprocate at the partner society’s meeting that same year.

The GPS partner to be featured at the 2023 ARRS Annual Meeting on the stunning island of Oahu in Honolulu, HI, will be our longtime colleagues from the Korean Society of Radiology (KSR). Established in 1945, KSR remains the official society representing all physicians of Korea working in the field of radiology. With a membership of more than 3,000 practicing imaging professionals—including 500 in-training members—KSR also publishes two scholarly journals: the Korean Journal of Radiology and Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology.

The 2023 ARRS Global Exchange Featuring KSR, “Changing Paradigms in Tumor Response Assessment,” will be the latest in a very long succession of successful educational partnerships between the Americans and Koreans. These two vaunted societies joined forces to present a GPS symposium on breast imaging back in 2017. For that fourth KSR/ARRS online collaboration, respective faculty curated 15 lectures across five breast imaging topics that were delivered during the 72nd Korean Congress of Radiology and the 2016 ARRS Annual Meeting in Los Angeles, CA [1].   

On Sunday, April 16, live, virtually, and on-demand from Hawaii, the ARRS Annual Global Exchange Program will deliver a panel of experts from both the United States and Korea discussing a variety of topics and approaches regarding the quickly evolving role of radiologists in tumor response assessment. All participants, regardless of registration type, will gain functional familiarity with treatment response criteria across a wide swath of tumors, treatments, and techniques, learning from esteemed ARRS faculty from Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Rhode Island Hospital. I know I speak for the entire ARRS leadership and membership when I note how much we are all looking forward to hosting KSR’s leading experts from Seoul National University Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, and the Catholic University of Korea. Our Korean friends will help us understand locoregional treatment response evaluation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Immune Checkpoints: No Inhibitions?

Be it in America, across the Pacific, or anywhere else in the world for that matter, a chief radiological concern moving forward is recognizing the spectrum of responses and progressive diseases typically encountered in patients treated with immunotherapies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Right now, indications for ICI therapy already include more than 16 different cancers. As this number will only continue to increase in the coming years, academic and private practice imagers (in addition to radiology residents and fellows) need to know the hang-ups of ICIs.

Recently, on the AJR Podcast episode “Chest CT Findings of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy-Related Adverse Events,” Kerem Ozturk, MD, discussed why awareness of early chest CT findings is required for early detection and accurate diagnosis of ICI therapy-related adverse events [2]. Said events are myriad, including pneumonitis, new consolidation, worsening thoracic tumor burden, pleural/pericardial effusion, and pulmonary emboli in the emergency department.

We need to know about combinations, too. Promising results have been published in KSR’s own Korean Journal of Radiology regarding ICI combination therapy and ICI combined with radiotherapy. Specifically, as Kim et al. pointed out in their systematic review and meta-analysis, ICI combination therapy or ICI combined with radiotherapy can work wonders, showing better localized efficacy than ICI monotherapy for treating melanoma brain metastasis [3]. Inevitably, the ever-increasing adoption of ICIs will lead to more and more practical applications.

HCC: Mimics and Machine Learning

Due to its distinct imaging, HCC can be diagnosed noninvasively, typically via multiphasic CT and MRI. As Yoon et al. reminded us in their survey and pictorial review for the Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, while imaging features like arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images is classic for HCC, the ability to distinguish HCC-mimicking lesions (e.g., arterioportal shunts, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, hemangioma, etc.) on initial imaging examinations is critical for management and treatment alike [4].

Radiologists of tomorrow will need to recognize more than just mimics. We must become familiar with multiple machine learning models, as applied to presently underutilized imaging features that could help construct more reliable criteria for organ allocation and liver transplant eligibility. Apropos, recent findings suggest that machine learning-based models can predict recurrence before therapy allocation in patients with early-stage HCC initially eligible for liver transplant.  

As described in AJR OnTrend, 120 patients diagnosed with early-stage HCC, who were initially eligible for liver transplant and underwent treatment by transplant, resection, or thermal ablation, underwent pretreatment MRI and post-treatment imaging surveillance. Imaging features were extracted from postcontrast phases of pretreatment MRI examinations using a pretrained convolutional neural network. Pretreatment clinical characteristics (including labs) and extracted imaging features were integrated for recurrence prediction to develop three ML models: clinical, imaging, combined. Ultimately, all three models predicted posttreatment recurrence for early-stage HCC from pretreatment clinical, MRI, and both data combined [5]. 

Paradigm and Response Changes

Fortunately, the many recent advances in oncologic patient care are allowing physicians to move beyond nonselective cytotoxic therapies. Increasingly, our specialty will come to rely upon more targeted and personalized treatments for cancer: immunotherapies, stereotactic radiation, image-guided interventions, and theranostics. Alongside these novel approaches to cancer treatment, all houses of radiology will need to prop the door open for our specialty to evolve beyond tumor size measurement—recognizing the cumulative variability in the appearance of treatment responses and associated treatment toxicities by CT, MRI, PET, and a host of hybrid imaging. Given the proliferation of still evolving precision treatment pathways, abdominal, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary subspecialists must stay vigilant and informed. “Changing Paradigms in Tumor Response Assessment” aims to provide precisely that—a contemporary, rigorous update regarding the changing appearances of tumor response on multiple modalities and across a wide spectrum of tumors. I cordially invite you to join Jin-Young Choi, Joon-Il Choi, Natally Horvat, Katherine Krajewski, Jeong Min Lee, Sanghyeok Lim, Don Yoo, and me for the 2023 ARRS Global Exchange Featuring Korean Society of Radiology (대한방사선학회).

References

1. 2017 KSR-ARRS Global Partnership Breast Imaging Web Symposium. ARRS website. ARRS.org/ARRSLIVE/KSR_BR17/Home/ARRSLIVE/GlobalPartners/Symposia/KSR/BR17/Home.aspx. Accessed September 27, 2022
2. Ozturk K. Findings on Chest CT Performed in the Emergency Department in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Single-Institution 8-Year Experience in 136 Patients. AJR Podcast website. AJRPodcast.libsyn.com/chest-ct-findings-of-immune-checkpoint-inhibitor-therapy-related-adverse-events. Published January 14, 2021. Accessed September 27, 2022
3. Kim PH et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor with or without radiotherapy in melanoma patients with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. J Korean Soc Radiol 2022; 83:808–829
4. Yoon J et al. Atypical manifestation of primary hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic malignancy mimicking lesions. Korean J Radiol 2021; 22:584–595
5. Young LK. Machine Learning Models Predict Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Response. ARRS website. ARRS.org/ARRSLIVE/Pressroom/PressReleases/Machine_Learning_Hepatocellular_Carcinoma_Treatment.aspx. Published August 17, 2022. Accessed September 27, 2022

_{Published November 4, 2022}

On Friday, December 9, the final ARRS Virtual Symposium for 2022, Update on Breast Imaging and Multimodality Biopsy, will address timely topics, including digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), breast ultrasound (US), breast MRI, molecular breast imaging (MBI), and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Didactic lectures will emphasize the most appropriate biopsy methods and procedures for every one of these aforementioned breast imaging modalities—allowing multiple opportunities for radiologists to improve patient outcomes, using current technologies available for early detection of breast cancer.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

I will begin the presentation at noon, Eastern Time, on December 9. Focusing on clinical implementation of DBT, I will review DBT technology and important factors to consider for practical application, such as improved breast cancer detection, synthetic digital mammography, and workflow for screening and diagnostic populations.

Recognizing the need for DBT-guided breast biopsy, Sarah M. Friedewald, MD, of Northwestern University will present on advantages and disadvantages of prone and upright biopsy systems, as well as interpretive outcomes for biopsy-proven, DBT-only findings. Earlier this summer in AJR [1], Dr. Friedewald coauthored the first study of its kind comparing pathologic outcomes between patients with single and multiple architectural distortion visualized by DBT. Ultimately, for those patients with multiple architectural distortions identified on DBT, biopsy of all areas may be warranted, given the variation of pathologic diagnoses.

Breast Ultrasound

Liane Philpotts, MD, of the Yale School of Medicine will describe how to optimize breast US in symptomatic patients, pointing out tools to enhance correlations between sonographic, mammographic, and DBT findings. Additionally, Dr. Philpotts will describe methods for reducing false positives (false negatives, too). Meanwhile, 2004 ARRS Scholar Jessica W. T. Leung, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center [2] will help us define the clinical indications, benefits, and limitations of US-guided procedures of the breast, while assessing the post-biopsy imaging/pathologic concordance.

Breast MRI

As recent clinical perspectives have affirmed [3], MRI remains the most sensitive tool for detecting breast cancer; however, cost and acquisition time continue to be deterrents in adopting the technology for routine screening purposes. Following our first question and answer session of the afternoon, fellow InPractice breast imaging contributor [4] Linda Moy, MD, of NYU Langone Health will discuss the present role of screening breast MRI, alongside the roles that AI is poised to play in the very near future. Dr. Moy will also bring everyone up to speed on abbreviated or “ultrafast” MRI protocols for supplemental screening [5]. For her session, Laurie R. Margolies, MD, of Mount Sinai will detail the equipment and techniques required to perform MRI-guided breast biopsy procedures, pointing out both pearls and pitfalls to improve the overall patient experience.

Molecular Breast Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

Increasingly, MBI continues its integration into routine breast imaging practice. Haydee Ojeda-Fournier, MD, from University of California San Diego Health will present on this topic, describing the variety of MBI indications for use in clinical practice. Her lecture will incorporate discussions of the MBI lexicon, which is well-timed given that, as AJR acknowledged in July [6], we shouldn’t have to wait too much longer for the American College of Radiology’s BI-RADS committee to initiate its own incorporation of MBI lexicon into the BI-RADS Atlas. Finally, Janice S. Sung, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center will deliver a must-see session regarding a relatively new breast imaging modality that is quickly gaining acceptance: CEM [7]. CEM renders density and morphologic information on low-energy images in conjunction with physiologic enhancement via the recombined (i.e., subtracted and processed) images. CEM-guided biopsy is not only FDA-approved, as noted in the most recent issue of InPractice [8], it is frequently necessary for proper patient management. Dr. Sung will detail real-world considerations for setting up a CEM program at your institution and practice, followed by another high-impact question and answer session with the entire faculty.

The experts above continue to enjoy an extensive range of clinical experience with each breast imaging modality presently impacting patient care, so I urge diagnostic radiologists, full-time, or even part-time breast imagers—academic and private practice alike—to join us for Update on Breast Imaging and Multimodality Biopsy on the 9th of December. Offering 4 CME credit hours for ARRS members, the entire program will remain available on demand for practicing radiologists, as well as fellows, residents, and allied medical students, who are unable to attend our live event.  

References

1. Wang LC, Philip M, Bhole S, et al. Pathologic outcomes in single versus multiple areas of architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis. AJR 2022; 1–13:10.2214/AJR.22.27625
2. Scholarship Recipients: Record of ARRS Scholars. ARRS website. ARRS.org/ARRSLIVE/ScholarshipRecipients. Updated February 9, 2022. Accessed October 29, 2022
3. Marshall H, Pham R, Sieck L, Plecha D. Implementing abbreviated MRI screening into a breast imaging practice. AJR 2019; 213: 234–237
4. Moy L. Breast Imaging: One Size Does Not Fit All. ARRS InPractice site. www.radfyi.org/breast-imaging-one-size-does-not-fit-all. Published June 22, 2020. Accessed October 29, 2022
5. Mango VL, Grimm LJ, Harvey JA, Plecha DM, Conant EF. Abbreviated Breast MRI for Supplemental Screening: The Why and How of Clinical Implementation. ARRS InPractice site. www.radfyi.org/abbreviated-breast-mri-supplemental-screening. Published May 13, 2022. Accessed October 29, 2022
6. Hunt KN, Conners AL, Samreen N, Rhodes DJ, Johnson MP, Hruska CB. PPV of the molecular breast imaging lexicon. AJR 2022; 1–9:10.2214/AJR.21.27047
7. Gandhi J, Phillips J. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Current Applications and Future Directions. ARRS InPractice site. www.radfyi.org/contrast-enhanced-mammography-current-applications-and-future-directions. Published March 1, 2022. Accessed October 29, 2022
8. Weaver, O. Moving Forward With Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. ARRS InPractice site. www.radfyi.org/moving-forward-with-contrast-enhanced-mammography. Published March 1, 2022. Accessed October 29, 2022

_{Published November 4, 2022}

The ankle and foot are challenging areas to image and diagnose, due to complex anatomy. In advance of the 2023 ARRS Annual Meeting Categorical Course, “Pitfalls and Challenging Cases: How to Triumph and Make the Diagnosis,” our InPractice article is a collection of cases that we hope will help you conquer some of these pathologies.

Nearly all ankle and midfoot cases begin with radiographs, because radiography is the modality we usually encounter initially, and x-rays can often give us many clues about the diagnosis, especially in the ankle. In the midfoot, which has more complicated anatomy, cross-sectional imaging, especially MRI, is often required to make the diagnosis.

Case No. 1

For the classic inversion injury or ankle “sprain,” we typically think of lateral ankle ligament injuries, or a fibular avulsion fracture. Since the foot and ankle are relatively flexible, injuries can occur in many places. Our first case is a 27-year-old man who injured his ankle in a rollover car accident. In the lateral aspect of the talar dome—left image above—there is a curvilinear subchondral lucency (dotted curve) seen on the frontal radiographic view, compatible with an osteochondral lesion (arrow).

Osteochondral lesions (OCL) of the talus can be quite difficult to see on x-rays, and OCLs are often missed, especially when they occur with other bony injuries. For example, a patient may have a fibular fracture, which is adequately treated, and then experience persistent pain later on [1]. If the mechanism of injury involves shearing (e.g., tibiotalar subluxation), compression (e.g., falling from a height) or avulsion (e.g., distraction of the tibiotalar joint), the index of suspicion for an osteochondral injury should be higher, although these details may be difficult to ascertain from the patient or the medical record [2]. Impaction of the talus on the distal tibial plafond leads to microfractures in the cartilage and subchondral bone plate, and the increased pressure from weight-bearing can cause osteonecrosis [3]. This process can take a variable amount of time; therefore, presentation may be delayed up to 6–12 months. Even if the OCL is seen on radiographs, cross-sectional imaging is frequently needed. CT may be more helpful to evaluate small or comminuted OCLs, as ossific fragments may be difficult to visualize on MRI [4]. Apropos, the coronal reconstruction CT image of this case—right image above—demonstrates the mildly displaced, dominant osteochondral fragment (solid arrow). There is an additional punctate ossific fragment (dashed arrow) along the lateral aspect of the osteochondral injury, not seen on the x-ray. It would be unlikely to see this fragment on MRI, simply because of the inadequate spatial resolution.

Case No. 2

When an ossific fragment is not displaced, as in this case of a 39-year-old who twisted her ankle on the stairs 6 months ago, MRI can be helpful to evaluate for stability. On the coronal T2 fat-suppressed image—left image above—we can see that the fragment is somewhat irregular at the articular surface, but there is fluid signal intensity completely undercutting the fragment (solid arrow), and bone marrow edema in the adjacent talus, suggesting that the fragment is unstable [5]. There is mild subchondral bony irregularity and depression (dashed arrow), too. Other signs of instability may be cystic change or partial or complete separation of the fragment from the donor site [8].

The sagittal T1 image—right image above—shows that a large portion of the fragment is low in signal intensity, which persists on all sequences, and there is articular surface collapse, suggesting that the portion is at least partially osteonecrotic [8]. Another portion still demonstrates fat signal intensity (solid arrow) on T1 and high signal on the T2 fat-suppressed image, suggesting that tis portion remains viable.

This patient was placed on a trial of conservative treatment, including a lace-up ankle brace and semi-rigid orthosis, which had just begun at the time of writing this article. Management depends on patient symptoms, as well as size and stability of the OCL. In general, small (< 15mm²), stable fragments in ankle fractures are treated conservatively, whereas large, unstable fragments are managed operatively [3, 6–7, 9]. Surgical options include arthroscopic drilling, excision and debridement, or osteocartilaginous grafting [2].

Case No. 3

Our third and final case is a 33-year-old woman, playing tennis two hours prior to presentation, who had planted her foot, tried to run forward, then felt something like “a hit behind her ankle.” The patient could no longer walk without significant pain. The initial radiograph demonstrates distal Achilles thickening, and more proximally, a focally irregular anterior margin, consistent with Achilles tendinopathy and tear. Achilles tendon ruptures account for 20% of all large tendon ruptures [10]. Showing bimodal age distribution, the first peak occurs around the third to the fifth decade of life, due to high-energy injuries, while the second peak occurs in the elderly, due to low-energy injuries to a degenerated tendon. Men are more commonly affected. Achilles tears are more common in sports with forceful and repetitive jumping or “push-off,” often seen in cyclists, gymnasts, runners, and divers, as well as tennis, basketball, and volleyball players. Risk factors include poor conditioning before exercise, prolonged use of corticosteroids, fluoroquinolone antibiotics, and overexertion [11].  

Because the Achilles tendon is bound by the Kager fat pad anteriorly and subcutaneous fat posteriorly, an abnormal appearance can often be detected on radiographs [12]. The lateral radiograph—left image above—demonstrates diffuse fusiform thickening of the Achilles tendon (dashed arrow). More proximally, the tendon is irregular anteriorly, consistent with a tear. There is edema in the Kager fat pad (“K”), also indicating acute tear. It can be difficult to determine partial versus full-thickness tear, and in this case, the posterior margin of the tendon appears intact, suggesting that it is a high-grade partial, rather than full-thickness tear, although MRI later confirmed that it was a full-thickness tear. Ossific foci, if present, suggest chronic tears (not seen in this case) [13].

On MRI, we first observe that the foot was placed in plantar flexion, which may underestimate the tendon gap. While this typically does not preclude diagnosis of the tendon tear, it inevitably brings torn pieces of tendon closer together, and the maximum tendon gap cannot be determined.

The sagittal T2 fat-suppressed image—right image above—demonstrates a full-thickness tear (“X”) and severely degenerated proximal (dashed arrow) and distal (solid arrows) tendon. The uniformly thickened and hyperintense distal tendon is probably a combination of chronic tendon degeneration and acute edema from the tear, especially as individual fibers within the tendon are relatively well seen. It is important to comment on tendon quality and the length of tendon, which appears severely degenerated, because this tendon may not be useable for repair [14]. Many of the internal strands appear wavy, compatible with retraction. MRI is considered the gold standard for imaging Achilles tendon tears (sensitivity, 80–100%; specificity, 100%) (8, 15). Ultrasound also has high sensitivity (full thickness, 95%; partial thickness, 94%) and specificity (full thickness, 99%; partial thickness, 97%) for the detection of Achilles tendon tears, given the tendon’s superficial location and possibility of dynamic imaging with the modality (16, 17). This patient’s tear was also well seen on ultrasound (not shown).

Since the patient was only visiting the United States, she was placed in a boot for her trip home, although surgical intervention was required soon after arriving. Management of Achilles tendon ruptures is controversial and evolving. Overall, there has been a general trend moving toward immobilization with functional rehabilitation, rather than treating all ruptures exclusively with surgical repair [18, 19].

Focusing on interpretative skills for avoiding misdiagnoses across a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal imaging pitfalls, the 2023 ARRS Annual Meeting Categorical Course, “Pitfalls and Challenging Cases: How to Triumph and Make the Diagnosis,” will also tackle challenging cases within neuroradiology, abdominal, and chest imaging. Topics will emphasize real-life clinical scenarios, while providing tips and tricks for optimal performance. We invite you to join us on the beautiful island of Oahu in Honolulu, HI (or virtually or even on demand) for this exciting, 18-hour Categorical Course, purposefully designed to enhance your ability to add value to patient management.

References

1. StatPearls Publishing; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556139. Cited Accessed Aug 18 2022
2. Badekas T, Takvorian M, Souras N. Treatment principles for osteochondral lesions in foot and ankle. Int Orthop 2013; 37:1697–706
3. Rikken QGH, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: an individualized treatment paradigm from the Amsterdam perspective. Foot Ankle Clin 2021; 26:121–36
4. Yasui Y, Hannon CP, Fraser EJ, et al. Lesion size measured on MRI does not accurately reflect arthroscopic measurement in talar osteochondral lesions. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7:2325967118825261
5. Rios AM, Rosenberg ZS, Bencardino JT, Perez Rodrigo S, Garcia Theran S. Bone marrow edema patterns in the ankle and hindfoot: distinguishing MRI features. AJR 2011; 197:720–729
6. Pedersen ME, DaCambra MP, Jibri Z, Dhillon S, Jen H, Jomha NM. Acute osteochondral fractures in the lower extremities–approach to identification and treatment. Open Orthop J 2015; 9:463–474
7. Gianakos AL, Yasui Y, Hannon CP, Kennedy JG. Current management of talar osteochondral lesions. World J Orthop 2017; 8:12–20
8. Szaro P, Geijer M, Solidakis N. Traumatic and non-traumatic bone marrow edema in ankle MRI: a pictorial essay. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:97
9. van Dijk CN, Reilingh ML, Zengerink M, van Bergen CJA. Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18:570–580
10. Gross CE, Nunley JA. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37:233–239
11. Shamrock AG, Varacallo M. Achilles tendon rupture. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430844. Cited Accessed Aug 18 2022
12. Theobald P, Bydder G, Dent C, Nokes L, Pugh N, Benjamin M. The functional anatomy of Kager’s fat pad in relation to retrocalcaneal problems and other hindfoot disorders. J Ana 2006; 208:91
13. Paoloni J. Tendon injuries–practice tips for GPs. Aust Fam Physician 2013; 42:176–180
14. Bäcker HC, Wong TT, Vosseller JT. MRI assessment of degeneration of the tendon in Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int 2019; 40:895–899
15. Dams OC, Reininga IHF, Gielen JL, van den Akker-Scheek I, Zwerver J. Imaging modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review. Injury 2017; 48:2383–2399
16. Chang A, Miller TT. Imaging of tendons. Sports Health 2009; 1:293–300
17. Aminlari A, Stone J, McKee R, et al. Diagnosing Achilles tendon rupture with ultrasound in patients treated surgically: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Emerg Med 2021; 61:558–567
18. Park SH, Lee HS, Young KW, Seo SG. Treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Clin Orthop Surg 2020; 12:1–8
19. Deng S, Sun Z, Zhang C, Chen G, Li J. Surgical treatment versus conservative management for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Foot Ankle Surg 2017; 56:1236–1243